Even the minority party wouldnt be encouraged to negotiate because they could simply stall until the next election. This text is available online and is used for gudiance and inspiration, We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Either would provide a reason for both parties to compete in most states because there would be electors to win. We have seen this outcome in the 2016 Presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and in the 2000 election between George H.W. Evidence as to how a nationwide presidential campaign would be run can be found by examining the way presidential candidates currently campaign inside battleground states. This advance is referred to as the winner-take-all approach. The danger of NPV is that it will undermine the complex and vital underpinnings of American democracy. NPV is more than a third of the way to its goal. A simple change in the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could fix the flaw and still provide the benefits of a popular election. Thats the way it has been in this country for a long time. The official 2016 election results from the Electoral College gave Donald J. Trump the victory with 306 electoral votes v. Hillary Clinton's 232 votes. 15 states and Washington, D.C. have joined the National Popular Vote compact. Published: Mar. To determine the National Popular Vote winner, state election officials simply would tally the nationwide vote for president based on each states official results. 1. Many cities and school districts, under threat of a lawsuit by a Malibu attorney, have already adopted or are in the process of changing to district elections rather than remaining citywide or . The NPV movement seeks to create an unfair and unconstitutional system that diminishes the voting rights of citizens throughout the country and raises the prospect of increased voter fraud and. National Popular Vote - Pros and Cons : r/NeutralPolitics - reddit Imperfect, because its modern-day blessings -- enhancing coalition building, pluralism, federalism and grass-roots participation -- are enjoyed only by a minority of states (in any given presidential election 18 or 20), where the battle for electoral votes is competitive for both major parties. National Popular Vote Interstate Compact - Wikipedia June 7, 2022 . Should that happen, then the final decision of who gets to serve as President of the United States is taken away from individual voters. An electoral college would solve . Similarly, because a national campaign mandates a national message, there would also be a smaller incentive for coalition-building or taking into account the characteristics, needs and desires of citizens in differing states and regions. Watch out! Hillary Clinton, but won the electoral vote to become the 45thPresident of the United States. National Popular Vote: Circumventing the United States Constitution By entering your email and clicking Sign Up, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. Congressional Digest The National Popular Vote Though the original, some would say highly undemocratic, purpose. When you cast your ballot, you're not actually voting directly for your favored presidential candidate. Lastly, some Americans believe that there would be an increase in voter turn-out if people felt that their vote was viewed as a significant asset to their country. Under the National Popular Vote plan,the compact would take effect only when enabling legislation has been enacted by states collectively possessing a majority of the electoral votes:270 of 538 total. The National Popular Vote plan would eliminate what critics of the Electoral College system point to as the "winner-take-all" rule - the awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in that state. Although faithless electors have not affected the results or outcome of an election yet, in 2016, there were 7 faithless electors. Would you like to get a custom essay? Using the NPV system means that every vote counts the same. But sometime in the future the popular vote will change back and lean Republican. They have only won the popular vote once. That, in turn, would likely diminish voter turnout. Unexpected emergencies would be difficult to handle. Each vote would affect each candidate instead of being overlooked due to which state those votes would be coming from. Resource allocation would be focused on paid advertising, which would negate the need for grassroots activities. ThoughtCo, Dec. 16, 2020, thoughtco.com/the-national-popular-vote-plan-3322047. Where the National Popular Vote Plan Stands. How about receiving a customized one? The Electoral College - Top 3 Pros and Cons - ProCon.org In the 2020 general election, a ballot proposition attempted to overturn Colorado's membership to the pact, but the measure failed, 52.3% to 47.7% in the referendum. Inside Ohio or Florida, to pick two examples, the big cities do not receive all the attention, and they certainly do not control the outcome. Bosque de Palabras A popular vote structure would virtually eliminate the idea of a third-party candidate having a chance in an election. Many Americans are confused about how a win is obtained under these conditions and are on a quest to change this traditional statute. 3. In theory we could change how we elect our president every four years. It's time to abolish the Electoral College - Brookings on WordPress.com. 3. Presidential candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, or campaign in states that they cannot possibly win or lose; in 2016, 68% of presidential campaign visits took place in just six states. Home| Government| Elections| Electoral College| Electoral College Pros And Cons. In 2004, for example, candidates George W. Bush and John Kerry campaigned heavily in states such as Nevada while ignoring political issues in New York, a state that Kerry was sure to win, according to the University of the Pacific. Less would get done, which would affect the needs of households at the local level. It has also happened four times out of the 56 presidential elections. District Plan CONS Technically still possible, but A LOT hard to do so District 1 = Romney 57% District 2 = Romney 52% District 3 = Romney 70% Gerrymandering. The danger of NPV is that it will undermine the complex and vital underpinnings of American democracy. The Pros and Cons of the Electoral College - SmartAsset The electoral college is a tradition of American politics that's fairly controversial. But for those people who feel that changing how we elect the president should only be done by constitutional amendment they will feel that using the NPV Compact will undermine the legitimacy of the process even though its perfectly legal and constitutional. Disadvantages of the NPV Interstate Compact. Since 2008, 15 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws to adopt the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC), which is an multi-state agreement to commit electors to. Politicians would focus on fewer swing states (Bigger states more potential votes) Either would likely produce an electoral vote count closer to the popular vote. This move would ensure that the Presidency would be given to the candidate that received the most popular votes all 50 states and the District of Columbia. On a close popular vote, often defined as a difference of 0.5% or less in the tabulated results, an automatic recount would likely be triggered. What would happen during a switch to the popular vote would be unknown. Dont know what Ranked Choice Voting is? Constitutional Amendment to Guarantee the Right to Vote for All U.S. Citizens. Colorado is on the verge of joining a nationwide movement that could eventually change how we choose the next president of the United States. A candidate can win the popular vote in enough states to win a majority of electoral votes but still lose the popular vote nationally. After the process, the President of the Senate reveals who has officially been voted in as President and Vice President of the United States. The popular vote eliminates this issue too. 1. Before the 2016 election, the largest vote deficit in the popular vote was Al Gore securing over 500,000 votes more than George W. Bush. It would reduce the influence of third parties on the U.S. presidential election. It was a great idea in 1787 but the country has changed since 1787 and the people today want to elect the president by a simple, direct popular vote where whoever gets the most votes wins like we do in every other election in the country. Candidates feel they either cant win or lose with the votes from these states. Or states might explore what was recently proposed in Colorado -- that electors be allocated in proportion to each candidate's share of the popular vote above a certain threshold. How the National Popular Vote Plan Would Work. Over the long run the countrys popular vote in presidential elections has roughly been equally split between Republican and Democratic.*. Rebekah Richards is a professional writer with work published in the "Atlanta Journal-Constitution," "Brandeis University Law Journal" and online at tolerance.org. A faithless elector in the United States is someone who casts an electoral ballot for someone other than the individuals to whom they are pledged. But the much greater danger to American democracy is that direct elections may make it possible for a president to be elected by no more than 30 percent of the vote, regardless of his or her suitability for office, so long as there is sufficient money and a clever media advisor behind the effort. Although moving to a popular vote election would balance the weight of each vote, it would also create more sway in larger population states. Change), You are commenting using your Twitter account. 8. Gov Flashcards | Quizlet 48 Vitosha Boulevard, ground floor, 1000, Sofia, Bulgaria, Samploon, Inc. 2022. Instead, each state and Washington D.C. is assigned a certain number of electoral votes based on its population. 6. Second, some believe itll intensify election problems, such as illegally extended voting hours or irregularly high voter turnout (Richards). Popular vote better than Electoral College, Stanford scholars say A close election would trigger the need for a full recount. N.p., n.d. 5. It would reduce the threshold necessary to win the office. In 2016, Florida had 29 electoral votes and 9.4 million voters, created a voter value of 0.72. Samploon is a database of free essay samples. Under the electoral college, the majority votes of states assign electoral votes to a candidate, which then creates a majority total required for a victory. It would limit the influence of local issues in the election. Electoral College Alternatives: What Are the Other Options? - The Daily Dot cons of the national popular vote plan Join the thousands across the country who instantly rally when there is a threat to our democracy.